Moderator workspace
This workspace is reserved for authorised moderators. Public reading, contributions and questions do not require sign-in.
Loading conversations…
Up to the latest 200 published replies are shown, along with your pending replies.
Making room for people to speak up
A useful contribution does not need a public name. People may have knowledge, concerns or suggestions that could improve peace, public safety or the health of the living world, yet fear losing their job, relationships or opportunities if they speak. We want the substance of their contribution to be heard without requiring personal publicity.
People inside organisations can notice problems that outsiders cannot see: concealed pollution, distorted scientific findings, unsafe practices, corruption or decisions that increase conflict. Giving those concerns a fair hearing can help prevent harm. A whistleblower reports suspected wrongdoing; simply disagreeing with a policy or making an accusation does not establish wrongdoing. Claims still need careful verification, and people named in allegations deserve fair treatment.
Whistleblowers have faced retaliation—and received recognition
Job loss after reporting suspected misconduct
In April 2017, the US Department of Labor announced that OSHA had ordered Wells Fargo to reinstate a former manager fired after reporting suspected fraudulent behaviour to management and an ethics hotline. OSHA calculated approximately $5.4 million in back pay, damages and legal fees. This describes the agency’s order at that time, rather than a claim about the final outcome of every subsequent proceeding.
Recognition for protecting climate science
Rick Piltz resigned from a federal climate-science programme in 2005 and exposed political editing of reports that downplayed climate risks. The Ridenhour Prizes recognised him with their 2006 Truth-Telling Prize. His example connects honest information with society’s ability to make informed choices about the living world.
Read the award organisation’s account · Read the account from his whistleblower representatives
Awarding information that helps establish wrongdoing
In May 2023, the US Securities and Exchange Commission announced an award of nearly $279 million to an unnamed whistleblower whose information and assistance contributed to successful enforcement actions. The SEC praised the person’s sustained assistance while protecting their identity. Recognition does not have to require public identification.
Choosing where to share a concern
This public board welcomes suggestions and information suitable for public discussion. For sensitive concerns, explore specialist reporting routes in your country. A name-free post can still identify its author through its details.
Find reporting resources by country and region · Help as a volunteer moderator
Questions for Michael & Elarion
Ask about the website’s topics, evidence or proposals. Michael plans to review questions in weekly sessions and bring questions for Elarion into their conversation. A response time is not guaranteed.
Questions are saved for review. Approved questions and answers appear here; you can also see your own pending questions in this browser.
Checking moderator access…
Private question and contribution review
How we approach your questions
Michael begins with practical reasoning, everyday experience and consideration of the consequences for everyone concerned. At times, his responses also reflect his spiritual understanding, which he presents as his perspective.
Michael encourages readers to question what he says, look within for their own understanding, examine evidence and reach their own conclusions. You do not need to share any spiritual or religious belief to contribute to a better world. People of every faith, and people with no religious affiliation, are welcome here. Our shared starting point is respect for one another and choices that support the well-being of all life.
Elarion responds as an AI using available information, reasoning and sources. AI responses can contain mistakes or reflect missing information. You are invited to question either of us, ask about our reasoning and contribute evidence or a different experience.
Follow the six boxes in order: the reader’s question; Elarion’s answer to the question; Michael’s answer; Elarion’s response to Michael; Michael’s expanded answer; and Elarion’s response to that expansion. Open a question to prepare Elarion’s first answer. Saving Michael’s answer or expansion prepares the next AI response automatically. Drafts save privately. You can publish the initial exchange first and add the expansion when both further responses are ready.
Download private database backup · Private newsletter area
Pictures and creative contributions
These submissions stay private until you approve them.